Saturday, November 08, 2008

Post-election stats wonkery

I'm a big nerd. So here are some stats I found interesting relating to the election:

The most Democratic county in the nation was Prince George's County, Maryland. Fully 89.1% of the vote in PG went to Obama, beating even the 88.7% of Shannon County, South Dakota, which was the most Democratic county in the nation in the 2004 election. (92.9% of the District of Columbia voted for Obama, but that's not really a county since it's not a segment of a state.)

The only state without a Democratic county was Oklahoma. The New York Times, where I got the stats, doesn't have county-by-county breakdowns for Alaska, but among the lower 48 and Hawaii, only Oklahoma didn't have a single county turn blue. By contrast, six states - Hawaii, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont and New Hampshire - didn't have any red counties.

The county map still shows mostly red, but that doesn't matter. After the 2004 election, I recall seeing a map showing how most of the counties in America were red and how this was somehow proof that the Republicans were dominating the country. While a look at the '92 and '96 electoral county maps does show that many more counties are red now than were red even just 12 years ago, it's kind of important to know which counties are red. And the fact is that most populous counties went to Obama. Of the 49 states for which the Times has county results, Obama won the most populous county in 40 of them, and often by huge margins: he won Los Angeles County by 40.5%, Denver County by 52.1%, Cook County by 53.2%, Orleans Parish by 60.1%, Kings County (Brooklyn) by 58.7%, and Philadelphia County by 66.7%. All told, of his 40, Obama won 25 of them by at least 20 points. McCain's nine were the biggest counties in Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming; only two of them he won by more than 20 points (Greenville County, SC and Laramie County, WY). Even in some of the states that Obama lost, he won the biggest counties by sizable margins, including Orleans in Louisiana; Hinds County, MS (which he won by more than 40 points); Shelby County, TN (27.6 points); St. Louis County, MO (almost 20 points); and Fulton County, GA (35 points).

What's more, of the 50 most populous counties in the entire country (which, oddly, is the same as the list of counties with 900,000 people or more), Obama won 46. The only four he didn't? Maricopa County, AZ (home to McCain's base of Phoenix), Orange County, CA (rich people), Tarrant County, TX, and Salt Lake County, UT (reliably Republican Mormons, although McCain won this county with less than 50% of the vote and by just 0.5 points). Obama also won many of the 46 quite handily, taking at least 60% of the vote in 25 of the 46 and more than 70% of the vote in ten of them. Even in McCain's most commanding win of his four, Tarrant County, he took just 55.6% of the vote.

And even besides that, Obama's most motivated counties were more populous than McCain's in most states. In fact, the county that gave Obama the highest percentage of its vote among the counties in its state was often the largest or one of the few largest in its state (this includes Cook in IL, Wayne in MI, Philadelphia in PA, Bronx in NY, Suffolk in MA, San Francisco in CA, Multnomah in OR, King in WA, Ramsey in MN, Essex in NJ, Cuyahoga in OH, and Shelby in TN), whereas McCain's most motivated supporters were usually found in more rural and/or less populated counties. In only seven states was McCain's most motivated county more populous than Obama's, and only in Hawaii - where the most "staunchly" McCain county, Honolulu, gave him a full 29% of the vote - was the county that gave its biggest percentage of the vote to McCain the biggest county in its state.

The greatest percentage of votes in one county was 93.2%, going to McCain in King County, Texas. I love this one mostly because of how few voters there were in King County (the third-smallest county by population in the US). 151 people voted for McCain, and eight voted for Obama. Eight??? I love it. Who are these eight people and why do they live there?

Nearly every state got more Democratic. Indiana went from +21 GOP to +1 for the Democrats, amazingly. And it's not just the ones that switched - already blue states got bluer. California, for example, went from +10 for Kerry in 2004 to +24 for Obama. Hawaii went from +9 for Kerry to +45 for Obama. Even Kerry's home state of Massachusetts went from +25 to +26. The only states that got redder? Arkansas (+10 to +20), Louisiana (+15 to +19), and Tennessee (+14 to +15). Oklahoma and West Virginia stayed the same.

Obama got 52.6% of the popular vote. It's the most of any candidate since Bush I in 1988, and the most for a Democrat since Lyndon Johnson in 1964, also the last time the Democrats won Indiana and Virginia. Of course, this part you probably already knew. I bring it up more to point out how hilarious it is that conservatives have jumped right on the "This isn't a mandate for the Democrats" wagon. This is the same party that bragged about Bush's "political capital" after he won 2% less of the popular vote and almost 80 fewer electoral votes than Obama got this year. (In case you didn't buy that the results of the election aren't a mandate for Obama, some conservatives have started to argue that he's "center-right" and that his policies resemble Dwight Eisenhower's. Anything to avoid the fact that this election was an absolute destruction of the Republican party.)

January 20 can't come soon enough.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

With apologies to Snow Patrol

Take back the country for yourself tonight
I'll take back the country for me
Take back the country for yourself tonight
Whoa oh oh

God knows you've put your life into its hands
And it's both cradled you and crushed
But now it's time to make your own demands
Whoa oh oh

It's a mess, it's a start, it's a flawed work of art
Your country, your call, every crack, every wall
Pick a side, pick a fight, but get your epitaph right
Or you can sing 'til you drop, 'cause the fun just never stops

I love this country tonight
I love this country always
It bares its teeth like a light
And spits me out after days
But we're all gluttons for it
We know it's wrong and it's right
For every time it's been hit
Take back the country tonight.


We did it. Now let's just look forward to four (or eight) years of governance that we can actually be proud of for a change.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Monday, November 03, 2008

The Official BigFlax.com Presidential Endorsement

I know that a number of you have been waiting patiently to see which candidate this blog would endorse for President in the upcoming election. So here's your answer: Barack Obama.

I usually try not to be too political here, mostly because people get bored by that kind of stuff rather easily, and also because if you agree with me you don't need much preaching to, and if you don't you're probably not interested in my opinion. But I think we can all agree that after eight long years - emphasis on the long - it's time for a change.

John McCain might have been that change once. I know that some people who remember his 2000 campaign and his early opposition to the Bush tax cuts still think of him fondly as a maverick. But look at his record since then. He has drifted to the right on many issues, including now suddenly taking a hard line stance on abortion, his suggestion that he would extend the Bush tax cuts, and his selection of a far-right evangelical Christian with no national political experience as his running mate. 2000 John McCain wouldn't have won the Republican primaries, but 2008 John McCain can't win the general election. He's moved too far right at a time when that's clearly not what this country needs.

Even if you believe that McCain has only behaved this way to get elected, why should that be encouraging? Do you want a president who's willing to compromise everything he believes in just to win the office? Furthermore, his decision-making during the campaign has been severely questionable, and even if he were to turn back into Maverick McCain the second he was sworn in, it's unlikely that he would suddenly surround himself with better, smarter advisors, and Sarah Palin would still be a heartbeat away from the presidency, and I speak with no hesitation when I say that I find her the most unpleasant, least intelligent person to grace a presidential ticket in my lifetime.

By contrast, consider the case for Obama. While his enemies on the right charge that he is inexperienced, he has fashioned from nothing - with the help of talented advisors - possibly the greatest electoral machine this country has ever seen, one that swallowed up not one but two candidates who were sure the presidency was theirs for the taking. For all of Sarah Palin's posturing regarding executive experience, the mobilization of the Obama juggernaut is far more impressive to me than two years in charge of parceling out oil revenues. Throughout the entire campaign Obama has remained level-headed while McCain and Palin have increasingly frothed at the mouth; while he has misstated McCain's record at times to score points with supporters, he certainly has done nothing that has risen anywhere near the level of the far more personal attacks the right has leveled at him (and in fact many of his misstatements of McCain's record have later been corrected, suggesting that they may be misunderstandings rather than deliberate attempts to deceive in at least some cases). The right has run one of the dirtiest campaigns in history against Obama - and coming on the heels of two GEs with Karl Rove in charge of the GOP's sleaze machine, that's saying something - and Obama has not just weathered the storm but largely risen above it.

Obama's promises may seem to some like pie-in-the-sky, but most campaigns are like that. With a Congress that will be controlled by the Democrats (who still have a slim chance at a supermajority in the Senate), Obama certainly has a much better chance to enact his policies than a President McCain would. In that scenario, the only reason to vote for McCain is if you prefer inaction, but given the support Obama has been getting, it appears that much of the country prefers his plans to reverse the recession, fix health care, and deal with education, among others. Certainly I do - at the very least, considering how Republican policies have failed to do these things over the past eight years, what could be wrong with letting the Democrats have a turn? If they mess up, I'm sure people will be lining up to vote them out in 2012, if not sooner.

Finally, an Obama presidency ensures a Supreme Court that continues to have balance. A Republican president - even one with McCain's supposed moderate streak - is likely to nominate more conservative judges to fill the inevitable vacancies, and while the Senate will be in position to block any Robert Borks or Harriet Mierses after tomorrow, they'll have a tough time holding out forever. A Republican president means the Court is lost to the conservatives for a generation, legitimately putting Roe v. Wade at stake (while this is a decision that should probably have been left to state courts in the first place, it's become too important as a national issue to allow the decision to fall by the wayside).

Many of you have probably already voted, but for anyone left, I urge you to vote Barack Obama tomorrow. A vote for Obama is a vote against the fearmongering and divisive politics of the right, and a vote for a legitimate chance to save the country's reputation at home and abroad. If the future of the country genuinely means more to you than scare tactics and race-baiting, there's only one choice to make.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

You're doing it wrong, Part 2

Today on CNN.com they had a story about an ad the GOP was running in support of Elizabeth Dole in North Carolina, and an analyst wondered if it implied that the GOP was effectively conceding the White House to Barack Obama:

A new Republican ad appears to suggest that Barack Obama has all but won the presidential race, an argument several vulnerable Senate Republicans may have to reluctantly embrace with only days until Election Day, an expert in campaign advertising said.

Aimed at Kay Hagan, Sen. Elizabeth Dole's surprisingly strong Democratic challenger in North Carolina, the 30-second spot from the National Republican Senatorial Committee warns voters against Democrats holding the White House and Congress, and flatly states that if Hagan wins, the party will "get a blank check."

"These liberals want complete control of government in a time of crisis, all branches of government," the ad's narrator states. "No check and balances, no debate, no independence. That's the truth behind Kay Hagan. If she wins, they get a blank check."

So, that's one item of interest, I guess. But here's the part I found more interesting: The GOP apparently has nothing better with which to promote Elizabeth Dole than "Hey, you wouldn't want Democrats running both branches of government, would you?"

Really, GOP? Really? You expect people to vote for Elizabeth Dole solely because she isn't a Democrat? Or, more accurately, you expect people who are otherwise inclined to vote for Kay Hagan - presumably the targets of such an ad - to vote instead for Elizabeth Dole solely because she isn't a Democrat?

This is the truth of the GOP these days. They aren't winning the war on policy, so all they have are scare tactics, name-calling and advertising that damns their own Senate candidates with the faintest praise possible. Elizabeth Dole is a sitting senator; don't you have anything in her record to run on? Nothing but "I sure hope people like divided government so much they're willing to vote for someone they otherwise wouldn't just to prevent, maybe, a Democratic supermajority in the Senate?" All right then.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

You're doing it wrong

Ponte Fresco is a make-your-own-salad sort of place in my building, where you pick a green base (romaine, spring mix, spinach) and they mix in your choice of additional ingredients (vegetables, legumes, meats) and chop it all up for you. Here is what the woman behind me ordered today:

[she has a container of spinach selected]
Staffperson: What would you like on it?
Woman: Bacon, and two scoops of cheddar cheese.
Staffperson: And?
Woman: That's it.

Why even get a salad if that's what you're going to do to it?

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

The Politics of Division

In 1999, during the early part of his campaign for the White House, George W. Bush described himself as "a uniter, not a divider." This phrase was widely used for mockery when Bush turned into one of history's most partisan presidents, but compared to his successors as conservative-value standard bearers, Bush is starting to look like Gandhi. Sarah Palin and the far-right-wing cadre that John McCain never wanted a part of until he deemed it necessary to be a viable Republican candidate have amped up their rhetoric in recent weeks to a degree that McCain's campaign now looks like the most bitterly divisive since George Wallace took five Southern states in 1968.

Here are just some of the many recent examples:

* During a speech in North Carolina, Palin discussed how much she liked visiting "pro-America" parts of the country. Naturally, this implies that there are "anti-America" parts of the country. Her pro-small-town rhetoric during the RNC equally implied that urban areas - which tend to go heavy for Democrats at election time - were not full of the "good people" whose virtues she extolled. Then, of course, there's her use of inflammatory terms when referring to Obama, suggesting that his policies are little more than socialism and accusing him of "palling around with terrorists," as though he and Osama Bin Laden were playing Connect Four or something.

* McCain advisor Nancy Pfotenhauer saying the following on MSNBC: "I certainly agree that northern Virginia has gone more Democratic. As a proud resident of Oakton, Virginia, I can tell you that the Democrats have just come in from the District of Columbia and moved in to northern Virginia, and that's really what you see there. But the rest of the state, real Virginia if you will, I think will be very responsive to Senator McCain's message."

That's right: real Virginia. Not that ersatz, Virginia-like substance in the northern part of the state. Clearly Democrats have just been flooding in from DC, which explains why DC no longer has any people in it. What the fuck is she talking about? Guess what - it's yet more division. If you're not receptive to McCain's rhetoric, it must be because you're some sort of liberal carpetbagger. That's the only reason McCain could be losing ground in traditional Republican strongholds. I wonder what her excuse is for North Carolina and Colorado?

* The worst of them all comes from Minnesota representative Michele Bachmann:



Bachmann can't even be bothered to separate her talking points, which Matthews calls her on; Tony Rezko isn't exactly known as a "radical leftist." But the scariest part is the last minute or so of this, in which Bachmann asks the media to "do a penetrating expose" to find out which members of Congress are "pro-America or anti-America." If this sounds like McCarthyism, that's because it is.

If you think this all reeks of desperation, you're right. Because that's all the Republicans have left. Even fear tactics, which have dominated recent elections as Republicans insist that only they are equipped to defend America, haven't been working. Division is the only avenue even more extreme. People aren't swayed by the suggestion that Barack Obama is too liberal? Then call him anti-American. Districts aren't voting your way? That's not the real part of the state anyway.

The irony in all this is that the only thing that seems to qualify someone for the "anti-American" label is not being a flag-waving, jingoistic yahoo who supports the government no matter what it does. So, assuming Obama wins, is that going to make all the Republicans who hate him "anti-American"? (Of course not! Nothing can be negative if it's done by Republicans.)

It always reminds me of the quote from The American President, in which Sydney Wade asks liberal-minded president Andrew Shepherd how he's able to keep quiet in the face of mounting attacks on his character by his Republican challenger (not so ironically played by Richard Dreyfuss, who would go on to play Dick Cheney in W.). "How," she asks him, "do you have patience for people who claim to love America but clearly can't stand Americans?"

That's exactly how I feel. How can you take the McCain campaign seriously when it's talking out of both sides of its mouth? It's ready to label anyone who isn't voting for McCain as "fake," and people with liberal viewpoints as "anti-American." But what's more anti-American than slandering half the population like that? It doesn't even matter what McCain's policies are anymore, apparently - you're either for them or you're against them. Of course, if you're Palin - the nasty, mud-slinging attack dog who has lied about virtually every facet of her record as mayor and governor - that's the only reason you're here. She doesn't have the background that would lead her to have formulated any national or foreign policies. All she has is supposed blue-collar cred, enabling her to toss around words like "terrorist" and "pro-America" with no regard for the issues (never mind her connections to the Alaskan Independence Party, at least as solid as Obama's ties to William Ayers and about as "anti-American" as it gets).

Some people wonder how much of this ultra-right-wing attitude McCain really buys into, speculating that maybe he's just doing it because he thought it was the only way to win the presidency in what's clearly his last chance. I say it doesn't matter. Are you really willing to take the chance that McCain the Maverick would suddenly show up again on his first day in office, with a wingnut VP ready to step forward should anything happen? The Republicans would like you to believe you can judge a man by the company he keeps, but if it's true of Obama, it's true of McCain as well. And McCain has surrounded himself with people who clearly loathe more than half of the country. After eight years of failed Republican policies, why should we accept more leadership from a party that openly hates those of us who aren't willing to goose-step?

Tuesday, October 07, 2008

Ben Folds' laundry

To this point, Ben Folds' entire solo career took place within the context of his third and (to date) longest marriage, to Frally Hynes. Folds' relationship with Hynes undoubtedly did much to shape aspects of his songwriting; "The Luckiest," from 2001's Rockin' the Suburbs, certainly seems to refer to her, and she also has writing and vocal credits on that album. Her voice pops up on "Dog," from the 2003 Speed Graphic EP, and she appears on the cover of 2004's Super D, which also includes a song called "Adelaide," a tribute of sorts to where Folds and Hynes lived at one time.

But in 2006, they separated, and officially divorced in 2007. Folds has since re-married, but one might rightly wonder if the after-effects of his divorce would come out on Way to Normal, Folds' new album, especially given the nearly three-and-a-half-year hiatus since the release of 2005's Songs for Silverman. Folds was quoted as saying that everything he wanted to say about the divorce in song was on Silverman, and looking back you can see how that might be the case; Silverman is a relatively melancholy album, and it has a number of songs that, in retrospect, could perhaps be read as early evidence that Folds' marriage was only going to last so much longer (and the separation did come the year after Silverman's release) - "You to Thank" is about a rushed-into marriage; "Landed" is about escaping a bad relationship; "Trusted" is about a fracturing relationship; "Give Judy My Notice" is about leaving a bad relationship; "Time" is about the immediate fallout of the end of a relationship. Seen in that light, it isn't necessarily that subtle, though at the time it just seemed like these songs could have been more abstract or drawn from moments in Folds' past (as he had already gone through two divorces).

But Way to Normal sort of has one foot in each aspect of Folds' recent history. On the one hand, it kicks off with some of Folds' most upbeat, up-tempo piano rock in years; on the other, there certainly seems to be lingering bitterness and sadness that comes out in several songs. Folds has never been afraid to write about personal issues - let's not forget that "Brick," the biggest hit spawned by Ben Folds Five, is about taking a girlfriend to get an abortion - and he certainly seems to have mined his life for yet more material here.

Track 1 - "Hiroshima (B B B Benny Hit His Head)"
The title of the track is an obvious reference to Elton John's "Bennie and the Jets," possibly because the main piano riff has some resemblance to the John song, as well as the use of concert audience noise (more prominently in "Hiroshima," which actually uses the crowd to sing the chorus hook later in the track). The story related in the song is a recounting of an actual moment on tour when Folds fell off the stage in Japan and ended up getting a concussion. It's all rather literal and straightforward, but then so is "Brick." The "oh-oh-oh-oh" and "They're watching me, watching me fall" of the chorus are almost ridiculously infectious, and when your goal is to engage a listener, it's hard to do much better for an opener than a song that virtually demands audience participation.

Track 2 - "Dr. Yang"
One of two straight "social commentary" tracks, in which Folds ridicules what he appears to consider a hypochondriac interest in alternative medicine. (One line goes "I might be dying / Or maybe I've got too much time," and the character singing tries out at least three different methods of finding out what's wrong with himself before eventually making his way from Dr. Yin, at the start of the song, to the titular Dr. Yang at the conclusion.) It comes off a bit glib, but the peppy, relentless melody and short running time (around 2:30) make it more than palatable.

Track 3 - "The Frown Song"
The same can't necessarily be said of "The Frown Song," one of the album's weaker tracks. Here Folds takes on the scowling rich people who wear grimaces like fashion accessories, but the song can be a bit of a chore - it contains almost no rhymes outside of the chorus, as though Folds jotted down a few notes and then just sang them. The opening image is evocatively sarcastic - "Tread slowly from the car to the spa like a weary, war-torn refugee / Crossing the border with your starving child; it's a struggle just to get to Shiatsu" - but things don't really improve, aside from the upbeat choruses, which are surely intended to completely shift the mood but sound no less jarring for that. At least they provide a welcome respite from the dentist's drill that accompanies the verses.

Track 4 - "You Don't Know Me"
Here's where Folds' personal life seems to kick in; he starts off by asking the addressee, "Do you ever sit and wonder, it's so strange that we could be together for so long and never know, never care what goes on in the other one's head?" The key moment is around the two-minute mark, when Folds asks, "If I'm the person that you think I am, the clueless chump you seem to think I am, so easily led astray, an errant dog who occasionally escapes and needs a shorter leash, then why the fuck would you want me back? Maybe it's because you don't know me at all." You don't get much more blunt than that, do you? I haven't heard Folds state that this song is about the demise of his marriage to Hynes, but knowing the context it's pretty hard to think of it any other way. As for the song itself, I had to listen to it a few times before it grew on me; the instrumentation isn't exactly classic Folds in the way it leans heavily on strings, but Regina Spektor's voice is a good addition.

Tracks 5 and 6 - "Before Cologne"/"Cologne"
If "You Don't Know Me" is the album's bitter pill, "Cologne" is the track that shows you the other side of a relationship's end. Folds may indeed have been bitter and angry, but surely he was also sad at times, and "Cologne" presents that side, with the singer holed up in a hotel room after walking his erstwhile love to the train, sending her on her way to the other side of the world. Again, whether or not it's 100% autobiographical can be debated, but the reference to the Lisa Nowak story dates the song's events to February 2007, two months before the divorce was finalized (according to Wikipedia). "Cologne" is a tender, aching song, with a typically beautiful piano melody and a good use of backing strings; the lyrics give a real sense of sadness and emptiness, as when Folds describes the Nowak story and then wonders if the woman he's singing to read it, and if "we both might be having the same imaginary conversation." Perhaps even more affecting is at the conclusion of the song's vocals, when Folds simply speaks "That's it." Whether this was an intentional metaphor or whether it was just him marking the end of the vocal track and it got left in, it works perfectly with the song's theme.

Track 7 - "Errant Dog"
Folds bounces back into wackiness with this track, which again seems like it might have some connection to reality given that the title can be found in the lyrics of "You Don't Know Me." It's not exactly a common expression, making one wonder if perhaps it's even something that Folds has actually heard used to describe himself. "Errant Dog" is told from the perspective of a woman who grouses about her husband or boyfriend, yet nonetheless always seems ready to take him back. In line with the question in "You Don't Know Me," "Errant Dog" seems to be somewhat sarcastic about its subject, with the female character unable to decide if "he's my everything, he means the world to me" or whether she should just give up and become a lesbian. As for the music, it's a bit less accessible than many of the other tracks.

Track 8 - "Free Coffee"
Probably the least of all the tracks on the album. It's another piece of social commentary, in which Folds comments on the absurdity of poor people always needing to come up with money for coffee while rich people just get it poured for free. It's a fair point, I guess, but it's not really all that meaningful in the context of the song (it's difficult to tell whether or not Folds sympathizes with the character singing), and while the idea to strap Altoids tins to the piano strings to create the unique sound in the song was an interesting one, it doesn't prove all that listenable in practice.

Track 9 - "Bitch Went Nuts"
"Free Coffee" ends with a disposable bit in which a Zen-master character describes the difference between what happens if you ask a bunch of different women why their relationship failed and what happens if you ask a bunch of men; Folds' theory, such as it is, is that all men just say, "Bitch went nuts." Needless to say, it's not as funny as he thinks it is. The actual "Bitch Went Nuts" track starts with the music, which is a relief. Again, it's perhaps a surprisingly peppy song considering the material; Folds swears the song isn't about Hynes in any way, but surely he must have drawn on past experiences to some degree in coming up with lines like "And then she burned a telepathic link into the brains of all her embittered drones." As such, it's another song that's upbeat enough to sing along to and yet comes off more than a little bitter in the lyrics.

Track 10 - "Brainwascht"
Speaking of which. "Brainwascht" is at least partly a true story, according to Folds; a friend (or former friend) wrote a song about him that he describes as very judgmental and mean, and which, if you trust the lyrics of this song, was based primarily on information from a former girlfriend or wife. Whether the unnamed woman in this song is Hynes is unknowable; it seems possible that Folds is actually referencing an earlier event, since late in the song he snorts at the addressed songwriter by asking if he remembers "in '94 getting blown in your basement while your wife slept," and Folds wasn't married in 1994. It's another pretty bitter track, in which Folds complains that the songwriter didn't bother getting his side of the story but simply was brainwashed by whichever ex-wife or girlfriend he's talking about, but another one that's pretty peppy and otherwise fun if you gloss over the lyrical content.

Track 11 - "Effington"
Presumably inspired by Effingham, Illinois, this is a difficult song to read. The piano part is nice, but do the lyrics actually suggest that Folds wants to settle down in a small town, or is it one big, straight-faced joke told by a sixth-grade sense of humor that finds "Effington" hilarious? Folds starts by musing that "Effington could be a wonderful effing place" and then wonders "Are they effing in their yards, effing in their cars, effing in the trailers and the back roads and the parking lots of Effington?" Droll, indeed. I'm willing to forgive this, because the piano is great and because Folds never cracks a lyrical smile during the track, giving the impression that he's actually serious about finding an appeal in small-town life.

Track 12 - "Kylie from Connecticut"
Way to Normal lacks many of Folds' traditional character sketches, but he ends with a strong one, and another that seems to give a bit of a suggestion as to his mindset: the main character is a woman in a 35-year marriage who sees a note that makes her worry that her husband might be having an affair - except that at the same time, she flashes back to an affair she had some 30 years ago. (At least this is how I interpret the lyrics, though there is some wiggle room.) This calls back to "Trusted" from Silverman and, given all the other veiled references to real or imagined infidelity on Folds' part on this album, may have some connection. Perhaps that's reading too much into it, but you could argue that I read too much into a lot of the songs, though I suspect that in most cases there's at least a grain of truth to those suspicions. Musically, this song could easily have come from pretty much any other album Folds has ever recorded, which is more of a compliment than it might sound.

When I first listened to Way to Normal, I was mostly underwhelmed, to put it charitably, although "Hiroshima" and "Cologne" were pretty much instant grabbers. Since listening to it a number of additional times - enough that I can sing along with virtually all of the songs already - I'd say I like it, although I can't say it's at the same level as Rockin' the Suburbs, Songs for Silverman, or even the combined Speed Graphic/Sunny 16/Super D. Even a lousy Ben Folds album is likely to be better than a lot of other stuff, though, and this isn't a lousy Ben Folds album in spite of the bitter or caustic edge on so many of the songs - even with as many as three tracks that are significantly missable (though that's probably being overly harsh on at least one of them), there's still enough good stuff on the album for it to be a good album, and there are at least two tracks that I'd rank among his best. Way to Normal may not have been worth a wait of almost three and a half years, but it'll do until the next one comes along.

Friday, October 03, 2008

They're watching me, watching me fall

Sure enough, right as October rolls around, the weather cools off precipitously. On one of the last warmish days, last Sunday, Alma and I went up to Elkhorn, WI, for the Apple Festival at the Apple Barn. It was probably nostalgia to some degree; I'm sure I haven't been apple picking in 15 years, and I can't remember going more than once, but it was something I had been thinking about doing.

There are closer places, but the Apple Barn had a few attractions besides merely apples, namely the Apple Festival's promise of cider donuts and a tree maze. Unfortunately, it turned out that cider donuts are either the hardest baked good to make in the world ever, or just the most popular. The Apple Barn was limiting orders to a dozen per person due to a problem with machinery, and the line showed no signs of moving. We actually ended up going to Apple Holler, just north of Kenosha, where they did have cider donuts - and it was still a 20-minute wait because of demand. As for the tree maze, it wasn't exactly that tough. You could see through all the trees inside the maze, and the whole thing was only about 30 or 40 feet on a side.



Picking apples itself was pretty fun. I got a bunch of Cortlands and Ida Reds, which are both supposed to be on the tart side. I've actually only eaten one so far, so I should probably get on that this weekend before they all go bad and I feel like an idiot. I have been enjoying the cider we got at Apple Holler, which is really nice and tart, which you rarely see in cider.

To continue the nostalgia back to a time I'm not even old enough to be nostalgic for, we went for dinner to a Dog 'n' Suds drive-in in Lake County. It was interesting, although it was a bit cold for keeping the windows open by that point (the last day for the drive-in is actually this Saturday; it finally occurs to me why Sonic doesn't have any serious penetration north of the Mason-Dixon Line) and they were having trouble with their eponymous root beer (Alma did manage to get it in diet). I settled for Green River, which isn't a bad second choice.

On the way back from the Apple Barn, we drove past a farm that touts itself as having Illinois' largest corn maze. We might go do that this weekend. We spend so little time outside, might as well get it in before it gets too cold to do it at all, and some walking (the corn maze apparently covers as much as 11 miles) couldn't hurt either.

Fall fever: catch it! (Don't bother catching Cubs fever, though; it's only a 24-hour bug anyway.)

Friday, September 19, 2008

Posting

Wow, it's been a month? It's amazing how little has been going on. I did have my 26th birthday, which was pretty non-noteworthy. I got Blue Planet DVDs from Alma to accompany the Planet Earth she got me last year, which was nice, and my parents got me both a subscription to The Economist and the Rosetta Stone software for Tagalog, which I really need to get started on. So I got everything I really wanted, which is always nice.

Class has started up for this quarter and my time is already running pretty short. I'm just praying that as few Cubs playoff games as possible are scheduled on Monday and Thursday nights, although I'm also praying, of course, that there are as many Cubs playoff games as necessary for a title. If the expense of that is me having to watch a couple on DVR, I could live with it. If a potential World Series clincher was on one of those days, maybe I could make an exception (we get one free skip).

Politics are making me ill. I really just need to avoid this garbage until Election Day. And no offense, but if you're voting for McCain you're probably an idiot.